While Indian Government is very much benevolent towards Bangladeshi Refugees, there is no such love towards the Hindus who migrated from Pakistan to Jammu at the time of Partition. Bangladeshi refugees have made a shelter in India, got proper documents and enjoy all citizen benefits, while Hindu refugees are helpless and subject to policy paralysis.
Some 2,000-3,000 Hindu families had migrated to Jammu and Kashmir from West Pakistan when the sub-continent was partitioned in 1947. Many of the elders have died, but their descendants, who have swelled to 200,000, are yet to get citizenship rights because the state’s constitution does not permit this.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had assured them some four years ago that he would have their case examined. In spite of this and despite petitions in the Supreme Court and the state high court, there has been no movement forward.
Sixty-year-old Mela Ram Bhagat put it poignantly: “Manmohan Singh is also a refugee but he has become the prime minister. We are still where we are.”
The villian of the piece, as it were, is article 370 of the Indian constitution by virtue of which Jammu and Kashmir has a special status. Those originally from the state have citizenship rights and are called state subjects. These state subjects can own property, get government jobs, free higher education and the like.
This is not so for the refugees as their ancestors were not original residents of the state. Thus, even though they have access to government healthcare they don’t have the rights of the other citizens. Curiously enough, they can vote in the Lok Sabha elections but not in the state assembly elections.
They are not even entitled to ration cards, as a result of which they have to buy their provisions from the open market. This is quite a tall order as most of the refugees are daily wagers and barely manage to eke out a living. The others run small shops, tea stalls and the like.
The original families had realised way back in 1947 what they were in for and wanted to shift to neighbouring Punjab but were disuaded from doing so by then chief minister Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah, who assured them of justice.
“We do feel bad about this, but what can we do now? At the time of partition even some of us wanted to shift to Punjab from Digiana (on Jammu’s outskirts) but Sheikh sahib (Abdullah) promised that we will get all rights. Now we are children of no where and no one,” Bhagat lamented.
“Although we are human beings, yet we are living the life of an animal. This is our fourth generation here. But still we are aliens here,” added Bhagat, who lives with his family in a mud house in the Niki Tawi area on the western outskirts of Jammu. The small house is on a rented piece of land as the refugees cannot buy property in Jammu and Kashmir.
“The worst part is that we are not even entitled to government scholarships. They (the school authorities) ask for a state subject certificate if we want to pursue higher education. And we cannot pay for private education. We are three sisters and a brother and our father is a labourer. What do we do?” Sunita Rani, 17, who just finished her Class 10, asked while speaking to IANS, tears in her eyes.
She wants to study further but the situation does not permit her to do so as one needs a state subject certificate to go beyond Class 10. “I had a dream of becoming a teacher but now I have to sit at home. But I am searching for a job so that at least I can help my father in running the home.”
Subash Chander, 45, envies his classmates, “I had to become a labourer after doing my tenth class. But my class fellows, who were state subjects, are in government jobs or are in police.”
In all this, the politicians are fishing in troubled waters, says Labha Ram Gandhi, a leader of the refugees.
“The Kashmir-centric political setup does not want to take this decision in favour of us (refugees) living in Jammu as it would amount to losing the Kashmiri vote bank. This has become a political issue,” Gandhi said.
Revenue Minister Raman Bhalla of the Congress speaks for the political spectrum: “There is a technical problem in making them state subjects as Article 370 does not permit this. But we are thinking of via medias to provide them basic facilities.”
Lip service?